Douglas A. Millen Douglas A. Millen

Direct Dial: 224-632-4505
Email: dmillen@fklmlaw.com

DOUGLAS ANDREW MILLEN, is a founding partner of Freed Kanner London & Millen LLC ("FKLM"). Born in New Haven, Connecticut, Mr. Millen graduated from the University of Michigan in 1991, where he concentrated in history and literature and received his Bachelor of General Studies degree. Mr. Millen graduated Magna Cum Laude from the University of Illinois College of Law, receiving his Juris Doctor degree in 1994. He was admitted to the New York and Connecticut State Bars in 1994, and the Illinois State Bar in 1995.Mr. Millen is also admitted to practice in the Northern District of Illinois and the Southern District of Illinois and has been admitted pro hac vice in federal and state courts across the country. Mr. Millen is a member of the American Bar Association.

Since 1994, Mr. Millen has concentrated on complex and commercial litigation, with an emphasis on class action litigation involving antitrust, consumer protection, securities, and contract law. He has extensive experience in electronic discovery matters and the leveraging of technology toward excellent and efficient client advocacy and formerly chaired the Technology Committee at Much Shelist Freed et al. Mr. Millen's efforts have assisted in the recovery of billions of dollars for the class members he has represented.

Among the complex cases in which Mr. Millen has been significantly involved are:

In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1682 (E.D. Pa.) (pending antitrust class action in which FKLM attorneys have been appointed as co-lead counsel).

In re Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1775 (E.D.N.Y.) (pending antitrust class action in which FKLM attorneys serve as co-chairs of discovery).

In re Intel Corp. Microprocessor Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1717 (D. Del.) (pending nationwide antitrust class action in which FKLM attorneys serve as co-chairs of discovery).

In re Rubber Chemicals Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1648 (N.D. Cal.) (FKLM attorneys served on the Executive Committee of this nationwide antitrust price fixing action which recovered over $300 million in settlements for class members).

In re Cotton Yarn Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1622 (M.D.N.C.) (FKLM attorneys serve as co-lead counsel in this pending nationwide antitrust price fixing action which has thus far resulted in a partial settlement of $7.75 for class members).

In re Urethane Chemicals Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1616 (D. Kan.) (pending antitrust class action in which FKLM attorneys are co-lead counsel; case has resulted in partial settlements of $18 million for class members).

In re Parcel Tanker Shipping Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1568 (D. Conn.) (nationwide antitrust price fixing action currently pending as a consolidated arbitration in which FKLM attorneys are co-lead counsel).

In re Carbon Black Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1543 (D. Mass) (nationwide antitrust class action).

In re Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer (EPDM) Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1542 (D. Conn.) (FKLM attorneys serve as co-chairs of discovery in this pending nationwide antitrust price fixing action which has resulted in partial settlements of over $87 million for class members).

In re DRAM Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1486 (N.D. Cal.) (FKLM attorneys serve as co-chairs of discovery and played a major role in this pending antitrust class action which has resulted in over $300 million in settlements).

In re High Pressure Laminates Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1368 (S.D.N.Y.) (antitrust class action in which FKLM attorneys served as co-lead counsel).

In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1285 (Dist. D.C.) (FKLM attorneys served as co-chairs of discovery and played a major role in this antitrust class action which resulted in over $1.3 billion in settlements).

In re Monosodium Glutamate Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1328 (D. Minn.) (antitrust class action).

In re Isostatic Graphite Antitrust Litigation, Master File No. 00-CV-1857 (E.D. Pa.) (FKLM attorneys served as co-lead counsel in this nationwide price fixing class action which resulted in settlements of over $11 million for class members).

In re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 1261 (E.D. Pa.) (FKLM attorneys served as co-lead counsel in this case which obtained total settlements of over $200 million for the plaintiff class).

Edmund Ocanas v. Ford Motor Company, Cause No. 01-1804-A (117th Judicial District, Nueces County, Texas) (consumer class action).

Daryl Ceccato and Michael Fico v. AT&T Corporation and AT&T Wireless Services, Inc., Index No. 26803/99 (Supreme Court of New York, County Of Nassau) (consumer class action).

Gary McClusky, et al. v. Toyota Motor Sales, Inc., Cause No. 99-933-B (117th Judicial District, Nueces County, Texas) (consumer class action).

Arnold Carrillo and Debra Canales v. Snyder Communications, L.P., Cause No. 98 60545 4, (In the County Court at Law Number Four, Nueces County, Texas) (breach of contract class action).

In re Waste Management, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 97C 7709, (N.D. Ill.) (securities class action).

Engwall v. Amerada Hess Corporation, et al., No. CY-95-322 (5th Judicial District, Chaves County, New Mexico) (contract action).

In re Industrial Silicon Antitrust Litigation; Master File No. 95-2104 (antitrust class action).

In re Polypropylene Carpet Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1075 (antitrust class action)

In re The Prudential Insurance Company of America Sales Practice Litigation, 95 470 4, MDL No. 1061 (D. N.J.) (consumer class action).

In re NASDAQ Market Makers Litigation; 94 Civ. 3996 (S.D.N.Y.), MDL 1023 (antitrust class action).

Kevin Harms v. Koch Gathering Systems, Inc. David Fogelman and Richard Tuttle, No. 94-6629-H, (347th Judicial District, Nueces County, Texas) (marine oil spill class action).

In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litigation, 94C897, MDL 940 (E.D. Ill.) (antitrust class action).

In re Orthopedic Bone Screw Products Liability Litigation, MDL 1014 (E.D. Pa) (products liability action).

Justin Perish, D.C., et al. v. Intel Corporation, No. CV755101 (Superior Court of the State of California) (consumer fraud class action).

The McMahon Foundation, et al. v. Amerada Hess Corporation, et al, MDL 1206 (S.D. Texas) (antitrust class action).